Consensus
Fri 6 Dec 2024 4:32AM

Proposal: Responsibilities and Processes for Website League Keyholders

R ruby Public Seen by 36

Draft Proposal: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dn3gQ5BHvBDTwA6WJcdMq7dCy0rxkyuSck0ut2f1iJ4/edit

I've drafted a proposal with the intent to codfiy our current ad-hoc practices with regards to central infrastructure management and administration access. Please give it a read and provide any thoughts, modifications or other feedback.

Unless decided otherwise, this proposal will be put to a consensus vote after at least a 3 day comment period.

S

sirocyl
<span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.poll_proposal_options.no objection">No Objection</span>
Wed 11 Dec 2024 12:08AM

revoted

S

spdx-wl
<span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.poll_proposal_options.endorse">Endorse</span>
Wed 11 Dec 2024 12:08AM

i voiced concerns previously re: keyholder accountability and stewardship, but they've been addressed in the current version (that keyholders need to be stewards) so i'm happy to endorse this

K

Katja
<span class="translation_missing" title="translation missing: en.poll_proposal_options.no objection">No Objection</span>
Wed 11 Dec 2024 12:08AM

Everything looks as good as it did on the previous version of this vote, so…!!

K

kouhai Fri 13 Dec 2024 1:30AM

haven't had the energy to keep up because of current events; an informal "no objections".

@tenna an example: acknowledged my removal from the list before this vote, on account of the above.