consensus check on renaming "decision-makers" to "stewards"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aeb53/aeb53ae074d92015344c6c6e5a201bff8349282a" alt="AB"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aeb53/aeb53ae074d92015344c6c6e5a201bff8349282a" alt="AB"
Poll Created Wed 25 Sep 2024 1:02AM
checking for consensus on renaming "decision-makers" to "stewards" Closed Tue 1 Oct 2024 6:00AM
I'm checking for consensus on the following idea:
renaming "decision-makers" to "stewards"
as brought up in the discord by @walking mirage and @wenchcoat system (and maybe others), "decision-making group" is clunky, awkward, and just kind of not a good fit. the discord has talked over a few ideas for what should replace it and the people in those conversations collectively think stewards is a pretty good replacement.
as i personally put it in the discord:
it sort of fits the idea that this isn't above everything (because anyone can be a steward for something), and that we're not the final say of everything (because steward sounds a lot softer than like "administrator" or "decision-maker"--you steward a landscape but that doesn't mean you control it)
if you feel there's a better word for us though (or complications/implications with stewards we might want to consider before committing to it), we'd love to hear it.
@sirocyl has also suggested we give the name "custodian" to people holding specific tasks/roles within the proposed stewardship.
i'm opting to consolidate that suggestion into this proposal because it seems a bit much to separately vote on that.
accordingly, if you feel there's a better word for this you may raise a complication for it below too. please do your best to specify if you have issues with one or both proposed words though, given this.
Results
Results | Option | % of points | Voters | |
---|---|---|---|---|
|
No objections | 100.0% | 24 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Complication | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Objection | 0.0% | 0 | ||
Undecided | 0% | 8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 of 32 people have participated (75%)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aeb53/aeb53ae074d92015344c6c6e5a201bff8349282a" alt="AB"
Alyaza Birze
Wed 25 Sep 2024 1:02AM
my rationale is provided in the body of this vote
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/040d0/040d01138cb17365c5d5464bbd7de907d4fef94d" alt="WM"
walking mirage
Wed 25 Sep 2024 1:02AM
no objections to Stewards. we should still consider whether we want a specific title for the body of stewards or just call ourselves the League Stewards
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8949b/8949b86b8f2d2fa21c4ce71e4311ea208765d238" alt="T"
Tenna
Wed 25 Sep 2024 1:02AM
I do like the sound of steward far more than "decision-maker".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6582d/6582d934fa29252a5e5970471cbc4f3304885d6e" alt="TD"
the dragon
Wed 25 Sep 2024 1:02AM
i like stewards and custodians
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ea8b/9ea8be644af9587c4a2c331c404ff46b1e7d46a7" alt="S"
sirocyl
Wed 25 Sep 2024 1:02AM
oh yeah quorum babey 🎉
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a42d5/a42d5bb878bbbe51bd5d10e8048ed9f7bc431445" alt="A".jpg)
atonal440
Wed 25 Sep 2024 1:02AM
I think this is good: I like Custodian as a role title a lot, stewards as a group identity a little less but it does seem appropriate.